Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aketarak


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was delete. - Mailer Diablo 06:20, 16 December 2005 (UTC)

Aketarak
Band article that doesn't seem to have any releases or a label, fails WP:MUSIC's guidelines for band notability. Not on AMG, 26 hits on Google. --W.marsh 19:10, 10 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Good nomination, Will. You give the case for deletion (i.e. why it isn't notable) and refrain from voting.  That's great to see. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 05:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)


 * Delete, fails WP:MUSIC with flying colors. No hint of being notable on the page or in google. - Bobet 02:22, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom - Groucho 05:20, 11 December 2005 (UTC)
 * The article's author has been repeatedly asked why the band is important enough for an article, but hasn't come up with a reason. Presumably this is because it is not sufficiently notable or otherwise encyclopaedic. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 05:36, 12 December 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. -- JJay 20:13, 14 December 2005 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.