Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhand Bharat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Per consensus. CharlieEchoTango ( contact ) 06:00, 6 February 2012 (UTC)

Akhand Bharat

 * – ( View AfD View log )

POV fork of various political group articles, Vishva Hindu Parishad Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh Article offers nothing new which cannot remain in the respective parent articles. Darkness Shines (talk) 13:50, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: The article content itself is notable enough for a separate article. The articles about the political parties have a scope much broader than this. This is a specific topic related article and I see enough citations here. -- lTopGunl (talk) 14:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep, as TopGun says, this appears to be a perfectly logical unit of information for an article, is well cited, and clearly a distinct topic from the articles on the political parties concerned - indeed, the fact that there is more than one "parent" implies clearly that this is a separate entity - we certainly don't want to copy it into each "parent". Chiswick Chap (talk) 16:26, 29 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 18:49, 29 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Speedy keep Are you sure they're all political parties and this belongs in these "parent" articles? There's another parent for all three, but these 3 do not have the parent/daughter relationships you seem to be implying. 68.107.129.156 (talk) 06:18, 30 January 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment. How is this a WP:POVFORK? How is this even a WP:CONTENTFORK? And how one article can be a fork of three different articles? If you think this is unbalanced, please, mark it so or, better, make it balanced. How does it meet any WP:DEL-REASON at all? Aditya (talk • contribs) 05:36, 31 January 2012 (UTC)
 * This was purely WP:IDONTLIKEIT based tagging. -- lTopGunl (talk) 08:19, 31 January 2012 (UTC)


 * Keep: There is no reason to delete this. It is a page which explains a concept promoted by right wing extremists. Despite the improbability of its implementation, it is still a real concept that should be kept alive on Wikipedia! — Preceding unsigned comment added by 131.183.0.122 (talk) 04:04, 2 February 2012 (UTC)
 * Keep: Unwise nomination! Joyson Prabhu  Holla at me!   21:23, 5 February 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.