Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhbar Ka Ek Panna


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Tone 12:12, 15 August 2014 (UTC)

Akhbar Ka Ek Panna

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable film. The listed film festivals appear to be something of a hoax (see this posting), and the film and its actors and director are not otherwise notable. WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 14:42, 31 July 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:13, 1 August 2014 (UTC)


 * WP:INDAFD: Akhbar Ka Ek Panna Varadraj Swami Shahzad Ahmad Rashika Agashe


 * Comment Of the links provided by, only the search results for Rasika Agashe (which was substituted by the search engine for the actual name in the article: Rashika Agashe) showed any signs of notability: she appears to be a known actress / director in Indian theater and film. Her involvement does not really bolster this film's notability significantly. The search for the film title itself shows that it was one of 200 films screened at a film festival in Thiruvananthapuram.  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 15:43, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete fake festivals notwithstanding, Wikipedia requires coverage in independent sources. This film appears lacking, giving us a fail of WP:NFF.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 23:31, 3 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, NorthAmerica1000 03:55, 8 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete per MichaelQSchmidt - No evidence of any notability. – Davey 2010 •  (talk)  04:34, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I see no evidence of notability. In addition, is highly skilled in assessing film articles, and willing to extend the benefit of doubt. If he concludes that the film isn't notable, I trust his judgment. Cullen328   Let's discuss it  05:19, 8 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. As per above. Clearly non-notable. CesareAngelotti (talk) 22:39, 12 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.