Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhilendra Sahu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:21, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

Akhilendra Sahu

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article has been pushed into mainspace multiple times from draft and is primarily edited by Technical Next Technologies which is the name of the company of the subject as likely COI. He claims to be a top 10 entrepreneur, but on which list is uncertain. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 05:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 05:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 05:14, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

See also Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Draft:Akhilendra Sahu back in 2018, which resulted in no consensus back when it was a draft. AngusWOOF ( bark  •  sniff ) 05:16, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Pinging from the MFD:, , , , , as the article is in mainspace.  AngusWOOF  ( bark  •  sniff ) 05:24, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete: Total garbage for Wikipedia at the moment. Dial911 (talk) 06:32, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as promotion. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 07:05, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete as failing to meet WP:GNG, as probable conflict of interest, as promotional, and as crud. The MFD resulted in No Consensus as to whether to delete from draft space or keep in draft space, which did not mean to promote this crud into article space.  Robert McClenon (talk) 09:34, 21 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete Excellent. I was planning to post to Afd today.  scope_creep Talk 


 * Might be worth clearing up this Draft:Akhilendra Sahu redirect when the article goes away. I accidentality left it behind when I moved the article to draft last night.  scope_creep Talk  13:07, 21 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete obvious crap from an indeffed editor, I've deleted the redirect from draft Jimfbleak - talk to me?  05:57, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Thanks Jim.  scope_creep Talk  14:20, 22 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Speedy Delete filing garbage on the Encyclopedia. --Harshil169 (talk) 15:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete way too soon for logical coverage.John Pack Lambert (talk) 14:29, 27 July 2019 (UTC)
 * keep enough coverage for wikipedia
 * Above unsigned comment posted by 2405:204:E688:231B:4DDE:5987:CAB7:27D7 who has not made any other contributions to Wikipedia. -The Gnome (talk) 06:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)


 * keep needs improvement, remove promotional content
 * Above unsigned comment posted by 2409:4043:2ead:f5e4:4891:d34a:cc8d:d14b who has not made any other contributions to Wikipedia. -The Gnome (talk) 06:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete this vanity piece created by a kamikaze acount that stands entirely uncontaminated by encyclopaedic merits. Due to the persistence of the perpetrator( s  ) a modicum of Salt would not be amiss. -The Gnome (talk) 06:48, 28 July 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.