Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhilesh Sheshmani Dubey (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Eddie891 Talk Work 18:49, 14 April 2023 (UTC)

Akhilesh Sheshmani Dubey
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

The subject does not appear to meet the general notability guidelines nor is there any indication of subjective notability. Previous AfD did not receive enough participation, hence this! ─ The Aafī   (talk)  18:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC) ‪AShiv1212‬]] (talk) 08:19, 12 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and India. ─  The Aafī   (talk)  18:07, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete Yup, fails WP:GNG. Most of the citations are trivial mentions of the sort, "Advocate Akhilesh Dubey, appearing for X, argued..." or "Y's plea through advocate Akhilesh Dubey said". Others are references to his opinion columns for The Daily Guardian (or, is it The Daily Guardian Review?), a publication that apparently sprang up in September 2022 and, afaict, has no reputation (good or bad) to speak of. Dubey has some notable clients but that does not justify or enable us to write an encyclopedic biography. Abecedare (talk) 18:43, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Skynxnex (talk) 19:29, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Journalism and Maharashtra.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 19:57, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete - not enough in-depth coverage to meet WP:GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 23:40, 7 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete As per the editor Abecedare  ~[[User:‪AShiv1212‬|
 * Delete for the reasons discussed above, and because he would fail my standards for attorneys. I note especially that belonging to the Inns of Court sounds impressive, but is a nothing-burger. The only big factor in his benefit is representing major clients. Bearian (talk) 14:35, 14 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.