Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhtar Ali Kureshi


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I've discounted a few SPA keeps that are fairly insulting as well Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:41, 9 July 2017 (UTC)

Akhtar Ali Kureshi

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

doesn't meet WP:GNG. cited sources are not RS Saqib (talk) 16:11, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:57, 2 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - it is poorly written as well. How did this article make it out of AfC?  I see where it was prodded and the creator of this BLP removed it on the 7th day.  The last name in the creator's user name Waleedkureshe is very close to the BLP's last name Kureshi, so there may be a COI involved as well. Atsme 📞📧 17:01, 2 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Really good catch up. Fails WP:GNG. He has not held any provincial or state level post so he fails that too. Fails WP:LAWYER.  Greenbörg  (talk)  07:42, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:GNG, no substantial RS Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:05, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete. Because it is difficult to read through, it initially appears that the subject holds a high ranking official post but on closer inspection this is not the case at all. He is just a lawyer working on a team that is hired by the State of Punjab to assist it in legal representation. Fails WP:BIO. Loopy30 (talk) 14:10, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete You're inspection skills seems to be doubtful the person is in the official team of attorneys hired by the State of Pakistan by the President of Pakistan. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 39.42.27.33 (talk) 16:32, 3 July 2017 (UTC)
 *  — 39.42.27.33 (talk) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 07:43, 4 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Don't Delete You may review it again as all your misconceptions will be removed from the revised layout of the page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waleedkureshe (talk • contribs) 09:56, 4 July 2017 (UTC)  — Waleedkureshe (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.
 * Don't Delete As no further counter arguments are being made the page should be upheld and should be kindly removed from this deletion page. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Waleedkureshe (talk • contribs)
 * Please do not !vote more than once in an AfD. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:08, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Journalism-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:54, 8 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. Sources are inadequate. Xxanthippe (talk) 02:58, 8 July 2017 (UTC).


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.