Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akhter Computers


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  d elete. - Mailer Diablo 11:13, 8 May 2007 (UTC)

Akhter Computers

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Advert written by GeoffatAkhter. No independent references. -- RHaworth 07:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC) Changes made to text to comply GeoffatAkhter references to be added--GeoffatAkhter 13:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC).
 * Delete, Van-Spam-whatever. Hornplease 08:42, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this vanispamcruftisement. MER-C 10:28, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete, WP:NOT advertising. Ødipussic 10:35, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete. "Akhter Computers deliver systems and software integration services, manufacture computers, produce network management solutions and supply branded peripherals and servers."  Another provider of "solutions" that doesn't appear to be in a chemical business.  Nothing in this article suggests that this business is ahead of the pack of its many competitors, and there are no independent sources. - Smerdis of Tlön 15:04, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete this vanispamcruftisement, as per same idea as Smerdis of Tlön. Nihiltres(t.c.s) 16:51, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Delete any article with a section called "Quality" is most likely vanispamcruftisement. This is one of them. JuJube 18:38, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - Notability (organizations and companies) is the criteria which must be satisfied, and some of the links seem to demonstrate that - just changed my opinion from "non-notable company, one of many that you would find in any computer magazine" - delete one, delete all, including, say Mesh Computers. Personally, I'm inclined to consider that no system assemblers are worthy of inclusion, as there are so many of them. Ace of Risk 21:55, 3 May 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment - --GeoffatAkhter 09:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC) I hope that the changes made have brought the page up to compliance with the Wikipedia standards --GeoffatAkhter 09:45, 4 May 2007 (UTC)--


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.