Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akilam Two

 This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page, if it exists; or after the end of this archived section. The result of the debate was Redirect to Akilattirattu Ammanai following a merge. Hedley 3 July 2005 14:27 (UTC)

Akilam Two, Akilam Three, Akilam Four, Akilam Five
See also Votes for deletion/Akilam One. None of these articles provide any context, none of the titles are known to Google. Sjakkalle (Check!)  11:56, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: No guru, no method. No article in any of these.  All are speedy candidates under criterion #1.  Geogre 14:21, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge into Akilattirattu Ammanai. Same applies for the subsequent number permutations of this.  Wikibofh 14:53, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge as above. Kappa 20:50, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Please change your vote with regards to Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Matthew 1:verses, your opinion here is not consistent.     1 July 2005 21:54 (UTC)
 * Delete all, these are almost speedy candidates due to lack of content and context, agree with George. JamesBurns 00:54, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge, unless it can be demonstrated that there is enough content for these pages to be more than stubs. - SimonP July 1, 2005 20:41 (UTC)
 * Please change your vote with regards to Votes for deletion/Matthew 1, and Wikipedia:Votes for deletion/Matthew 1:verses, your opinion here is not consistent.     1 July 2005 21:54 (UTC)
 * What do you mean? Those pages are clearly not stubs. - SimonP July 1, 2005 21:58 (UTC)
 * When you take away the "full text", image, and introductory fluff (the increadibly obvious matthew 1:9 is the 9th verse of the 1st chapter of the book of matthew, and the text describes part of the genealogy of jesus - extremely obvious because the text is and he begat X, who begat Y, who begat Z), most are little more than stubs.     2 July 2005 10:09 (UTC)
 * Even with all of that removed Matthew 1:9 is still longer than all of the articles listed here. It is also duplicitous to cite the shortest of 107 articles as a standard example. - SimonP July 2, 2005 15:28 (UTC)


 * Merged. Things like this should not be put on VfD, we have cleanup tags for a reason. I've already merged them into Akilattirattu Ammanai. They should now be redirected there. ¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸¸,ø¤º°`°º¤ø,¸ 2 July 2005 16:49 (UTC)
 * ''The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be placed on a related article talk page, if one exists; in an undeletion request, if it does not; or below this section.