Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Akisha Albert


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 21:32, 19 June 2014 (UTC)

Akisha Albert

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Disputed proposal from another editor. Difficult to find sources for this subject, though a lot of people made forums about her. Other editor's concern was: ''Doubtfully notable. The article has no reliable source. (Also, it was created by an editor with a history of making false claims, and the content is unverifiable.)'' Mr. Guye (talk) 15:12, 12 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. I was the editor who put a PROD on the article. At that time, its only reference was Facebook. Since then, the Facebook reference has been removed, and two references to forums have been added. Apart from the fact that they are not reliable sources, neither of them has any substantial information about her. They both consist almost entirely of photographs that people have uploaded to the forum. There are a few brief comments such as "She's beautiful" and "Great choice". There is nothing even remotely suggesting notability by Wikipedia standards. The editor who uses the pseudonym "JamesBWatson" (talk) 15:51, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete - Issues with notability.  Occult Zone  (Talk • Contributions • Log) 16:22, 12 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fashion-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:18, 13 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete. We've had several minor beauty queens appearing here recently, and precedent is well-established: not notable just for being an entrant to a contest. RomanSpa (talk) 09:02, 17 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.