Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Amanah Islamic Investment Bank of the Philippines


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   speedy keep. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 22:45, 15 January 2014 (UTC)

Al-Amanah Islamic Investment Bank of the Philippines

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Not notable. The only ref in the article talks about its acquisition by the Developmental Bank. Nothing has been done to improve its references to indicate its notability since prodding. Raykyogrou0 ( Talk ) 10:22, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Keep. The bank is obviously notable as the country's only Islamic bank, and if the nominator wanted references that did not involve the buy-out by DBP, there's this, this, this and this.  Again, WP:AFDISNOTCLEANUP, and I'm sure it would have been appreciated if the nominator actually decided to expand the article rather than just nominate it for deletion. --Sky Harbor (talk) 11:09, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (What if I told you that) It wasn't really in my interest to expand an article not deemed notable in the first place? And again, this isn't a matter of cleanup but notability. But with the additional sources added by you, consider my nomination withdrawn. Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 10:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy close. WP:COMPANY states that "Editors coming across an article on such a company without such references are encouraged to search (or request that others search) prior to nominating for deletion, given the very high likelihood that a publicly traded company is actually notable according to the primary criterion." It appears this was not met, if that has been done, they a 2nd nomination may be pursued. – H T  D  12:07, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * (I've just noticed this after the fourth identical post, exactly what do you mean by "they a 2nd nomination may be pursued"?) Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 10:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * Close/Keep AFD isn't used as a clean up, Also per HTD. - →Davey 2010→ →Talk to me!→  18:48, 14 January 2014 (UTC)
 * This isn't a matter of cleanup, but notability (however, see above^) Raykyogrou0  ( Talk ) 10:52, 15 January 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.