Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Harit


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Notability not asserted, and no references provided. DGG's google search found different people than the one mentioned in the article.  SilkTork  *YES! 21:29, 14 July 2009 (UTC)

Al-Harit

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This page is apparently about a minor character in Mohammed's life. However, given the contribution history of its author - see Talk:Mohammed - it appears that his primary motive in writing it was to fork a negative perspective on Mohammed into a new article. As such the article is not neutral. Chutznik (talk) 21:52, 6 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions.  -- TexasAndroid (talk) 12:14, 7 July 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - the one source used here is this book and as far as I can tell there is no mention of al-Harit, though it would be nice if the article creator could let us know what page of the 1000+ page book Al-Harit is mentioned. The few places I can find "information" about al-Harit is at website like answering-islam. Nableezy (talk) 22:54, 8 July 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Keep A considerable  number of sources --see the first two items in particular  and  -- not all of these are the person here, so we may need as disam or a fuller form of the name or even some more articles.DGG (talk) 06:50, 13 July 2009 (UTC)


 * Weak Keep The single provided source is reliable and verifiable Rirunmot (talk) 17:12, 13 July 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.