Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Kawsar (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. --MelanieN (talk) 05:17, 1 February 2015 (UTC)

Al-Kawsar
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Can't identify the significance Ibrahim Husain Meraj (talk) 09:19, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 16:32, 15 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Strong delete Even in Bengali, two links to an online newspaper mentioning who the editor of this publication is do not indicate any notability at all. This isn't a language barrier issue; the publication is not notable, full stop. It's a clear fail of WP:GNG and if it can't even pass that, then naturally it fails other even more specific notability criteria for periodicals. The only reason the first AfD ended with no consensus was due to there being next to no community feedback at all. MezzoMezzo (talk) 03:54, 20 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 00:08, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - it lacks even an allegation of notability. Bearian (talk) 21:32, 26 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.