Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Muhajabah

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was no consensus. &mdash; Xezbeth 15:05, Jun 21, 2005 (UTC)

Al-Muhajabah

 * Delete Spam 70.19.111.5 03:58, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Userfy if possible then Delete seems like a vanity page (note the list of personal web pages). Sasquatch&#08242;&#08596;Talk&#08596;Contributions 04:24, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete There's no room for bloggers in Wikipedia. --Bloghate 05:09, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Not notable. Alexa: 203,315. A &#1080; D &#1103; 01D  TALK  EMAIL  05:23, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Al-Muhajabah is part of an extremely influential software company, Six Apart, and her blog covers a unique niche. I'd also like to note that this nomination for deletion seems to be part of a campaign of such nominations by suspected double user User:70.19.111.5 and User:Bloghate. --ElfWord 07:38, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. VfD vandalism by IP address 70.19.111.5 who is working hand in glove with User:Bloghate.   &mdash;RaD Man (talk) 08:15, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete smells like vanity. JamesBurns 10:48, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete reads like vanity, Alexa score way too low. Andrew Lenahan - St ar bli nd 10:52, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, notability not established (and please do not the remove VFD notice template). Radiant_ &gt;|&lt; 10:53, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Strong Keep. Her website "veiled4allah" gets 52,000 hits on Google. She is definitely notable.  Also, though it may "read like vanity" to some (not to me), it was created by a frequent Wikipedia contributor, not someone who came on once or twice and just posted this article. DS1953 14:13, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Notability established. --Irishpunktom\talk 14:58, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep notable enough, and a unique perspective worthy of mention for the tiny cost of keeping this article. --Unfocused 15:25, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * DELETE WORTHLESS PRO-ISLAM BLOG STORM LEGION666 15:53, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Welcome to Wikipedia, STORM LEGION666. I've noticed that, with you're newly created user account, you've already managed to cast votes much like this one in seven vfd's (although you've done nothing else). -- BD2412 talk 16:25, 2005 Jun 14 (UTC)
 * I have reported this user for Vandalism in progress. Please remove this paragraph when problem solved. -Snorre/Antwelm 16:35, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Sock puppet user, likely (one can hope) will be blocked --LeFlyman 18:11, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * Keep, there's plenty of room for bloggers in Wikipedia; this woman is certainly more likely to be looked up than, say, Robert Harkness is. Eliot 16:17, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * delete nonnotable person. mikka (t) 16:26, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete While I have no issue with notable/renowned blogs/bloggers being on Wikipedia (such as the Baghdad Blogger), this one just doesn't cut it. This is a promotional article, not encyclopedic.. --LeFlyman 18:11, 14 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * keep please we have room for this one Yuckfoo 18:03, 16 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete looks like non-notable.  Grue  17:17, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep --but make into a redirect with actual name of the woman for the bio.  [[User:fabartus || TalktoMe]] 06:25, 18 Jun 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages.  Please do not edit this page .