Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Qaeda and ISIL Relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  19:14, 9 May 2020 (UTC)

Al-Qaeda and ISIL Relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The title of the article says that it is about "Relations" between the two terror outfits. However the article discusses none fo this, rather compares them. Even then, most of the comparison is OR and COATRACK. A couple of sources discuss the comparison of both outfits, but no relations are ever discussed. MistyGraceWhite (talk) 13:26, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete or change subject - per nom. ISIL and Al-qaeda, both, have different sources of funding through which they run their operations.  However, ISIS has a different take on this. ISIS believes that the United States is a secondary enemy in the region and the primary target should be to cleanse the Islamic community from within by killing the other Islamic sects, such as the Shia sect and other minorities. .  the article contrasts the organizations the title is misleading.Grmike (talk) 13:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)grmike
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Terrorism-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:46, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * comment - perhaps change the title to fit the content.Grmike (talk) 13:51, 2 May 2020 (UTC)grmike
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Afghanistan-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 13:47, 2 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Change subject so it fits its title. If that cannot be done, it will have to be deleted. CrazyBoy826 (talk) 17:14, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete, without prejudice to recreation. There is a legitimate topic here but right now the page needs some WP:TNT. If someone wanted to adopt this page and make it decent within the next few days I would gladly change my vote to keep, just give me a ping. Horse Eye Jack (talk) 18:49, 2 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Appears to be repetition of the content already existing on the main pages of the two articles. There is no necessity of having this page per WP:NOPAGE. --Yoonadue (talk) 16:00, 6 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete Superfluous page.--Vitalpantaryan (talk) 16:38, 6 May 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.