Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Shaheer Corporation


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  20:25, 18 October 2017 (UTC)

Al-Shaheer Corporation

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No in-depth coverage. Clearly fails WP:NCORP.  Greenbörg  (talk)  12:33, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 12:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 12:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. ʍaɦʋɛօtʍ (talk) 12:40, 19 September 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 02:26, 27 September 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete I concur with OP's assessment. There does not appear to be any references that meet the criteria for establishing notability, fails GNG and WP:NCORP. -- HighKing ++ 14:53, 2 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Satisfies WP:GNG. Enough coverage & has made headlines. See: DAWN, Business Recorder, Express Tribune & The News. - Mfarazbaig (talk) 22:58, 3 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 00:34, 4 October 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete as clearly self-serving advertising that could easily qualify as G11, showing Wikipedia is certainly not the place for them. Ⓩⓟⓟⓘⓧ Talk 16:18, 7 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - although I agree that the article is poorly written and formatted it meets Notability_(organizations_and_companies) given the coverage in the following sources.
 * 1) Tribune a leading news outlet in Pakistan.
 * 2) Dawn  Kagundu  Talk To Me  07:08, 10 October 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 13:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep - Satisfies WP:GNG - plenty of articles, even just from a quick Google search. Company has won awards, etc. Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:04, 13 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Please see WP:CORPDEPTH. Please show which coverage you are talking about. Is it reliable? If not then it fails WP:RS.  Greenbörg  (talk)  17:25, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Search results are not an indication of notability, and i've found that the the two awards won by the company are sourced to user-generated-content, , , or are awards given by a company-sponsored chamber of commerce. Both types of sources fail WP:RS.--SamHolt6 (talk) 17:36, 17 October 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete - Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. The awards won by the subject company are only cited to websites with user-generated content or primary sources, and the majority of the news articles about the Al-Shaheer Corporation concern the company being listed on a stock exchange (which does not confer notability per WP:LISTED.) In addition, the company does not seem to be individually notable within (none of the various articles on the subject indicated to me how this company is significantly notable within the meat packing industry) the industry and as such fails WP:MILL. In short, a company that has received enough coverage to pass WP:GNG but does not fulfill Wikipedia's other criteria for inclusion.--SamHolt6 (talk) 16:31, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete I can find some sources, but they're routine reporting on financial performance, like https://www.brecorder.com/2017/09/27/371743/al-shaheers-not-so-meaty-affairs/ or an unusable case study, like http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/0972820117712305 I don't see anything that meets WP:COPRPDEPTH or otherwise establishes notability. Mduvekot (talk) 23:41, 17 October 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete -- for lack of sources that discuss the subject directly and in detail; fails WP:CORPDEPTH. K.e.coffman (talk) 00:13, 18 October 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.