Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al-Sulaim (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. -- Cirt (talk) 11:44, 15 November 2010 (UTC)

Al-Sulaim

 * - (View AfD) (View log)

I am working on the backlog at Category:Articles lacking sources from October 2006. This article has been tagged as Unreferenced for the past four years. It apparently was deleted once before because it did not "focus on the issues." Talk:Al-Sulaim. Now I propose it be deleted because it does not follow WP policy on Reliable Sources. It seems to be an example of WP:Original Research. It has been tagged for more than four years, but nobody has stepped forth to provide the sources. I can't find any in a cursory search of the Internet, so I am Challenging and propose its removal for violation of policy. Sincerely, GeorgeLouis (talk) 19:27, 3 November 2010 (UTC)
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete (missing step 3). It is listed now. DumbBOT (talk) 11:34, 8 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Saudi Arabia-related deletion discussions.  -- Jclemens-public (talk) 17:12, 8 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep: but sources should be added. - Ret.Prof (talk) 00:36, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * What sources are there to add? Uncle G (talk) 01:28, 9 November 2010 (UTC)
 * I have left a message on the Talk Page of the author. User_talk:Kfupm2 He or she hasn't been around for a while, but let's allow time to respond. GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:50, 9 November 2010 (UTC)


 * Keep Nice clear source in Google Books:  There are also multiple items there for the individual people of the name, many of whom seem notable enough to justify separate Wikipedia articles.  I haven't attempted to search in Arabic, but a much larger number will probably be found in that language.    DGG ( talk ) 06:26, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. A source has been found and added to the article. GeorgeLouis (talk) 15:06, 14 November 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.