Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Ansar Charity Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 12:21, 6 February 2009 (UTC)

Al Ansar Charity Association

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

The only references on the web that I've found that mention this all come from the Intelligence and Terrorism Information Center, which is affiliated with the Israeli military. This should not be confused with Osbat al-Ansar, which is in Lebanon, and Ansar al-Islam in Iraq. Both of these organizations have a strong presence on the web. Also, the article was created by an account with only two edits, and the other seemed pretty anti-Palestinian.  Ja Ga  talk 02:19, 26 January 2009 (UTC) Delete - This clearly fails WP:Org as I could come up with no third party sources and also appears to be problematic with respect to WP:Spam and there is really nothing in the article to suggest the notability of the organization. The article is completely unreferenced and unverifiable and probably should have been speedily deleted several months ago. |► ϋrбan яeneωaℓ  •  TALK  ◄| 00:47, 27 January 2009 (UTC) 
 * Oppose I've heard about these types of charities before in the news myself, that is, charities dedicated to helping the families of dead terrorists. I'd say error on the side of caution and leave the article for now. Your arguement for deletion seems mostly based on the inactivity of the creator's account and I'm not sure how that or his other edits effect this pages viability, which seems like they could be alright with a bit of work. --Pstanton (talk) 03:33, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Actually, my main argument for deletion is that there are no supporting sources for this beyond a single source that could easily be biased. This article makes very serious, very negative allegations and we should not allow it to stand if we cannot properly source it. -- Ja Ga  talk 05:27, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:36, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 12:37, 26 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  MBisanz  talk 06:51, 31 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —  Aitias   // discussion 00:17, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete I could not come up with any consistent description in english.. There may be material in other languages, but I cannot work with it. DGG (talk) 19:53, 5 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.