Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Jami' Eidgah


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 02:28, 26 August 2014 (UTC)

Al Jami' Eidgah

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable building: the only G-hits for "Al Jami' Eidgah" Bangladesh –wikipedia are to Facebook. Beside that, the page was copied from Ar-Rahman Mosque, and despite mechanical changes like Ar-Rahman Mosque → Al Jami' Eidgah and Syria → Bangladesh, it remains mostly about Ar-Rahman: The photo is of Ar-Rahman as is the architectural description. Aside from the name place and year, it is impossible to tell how much pertains to Al Jami' Eidgah. —teb728 t c 09:09, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Speedy Delete. Fails notability. No significant coverage found in independent reliable sources. The contents constitute a hoax. SmileBlueJay97 talk 09:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete Not notable. —Frosty ☃ 10:39, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm going to have to go with blatant hoax on this one. The author has given us an article about an eidgah (an outdoor gathering place at which special eid prayers are offered) but then gone on to describe its domes and minarets.  An eidgah is very specifically not a mosque, and as an outdoor space, is unlikely to have a dome.  The author has also provided us with a lovely photo of a mosque that happens to be located in Aleppo, Syria, not anywhere near the Rajshani, Bangladesh location claimed for this eidgah.  The author has gone on to provide us with reliable (where are my sarcasm punctuation marks when I need them?) references such as the Facebook page and Wordpress site that they have set up for this place. All in all, I have to cry bunk!  WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 16:13, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * In light of this comment, I've gone over the other pages made by, (Punot High School ‎ and Punot Union), both of which appear to be at best unverifiable and at worst hoaxes. Hairhorn (talk) 18:06, 18 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Both Punot High School ‎ and Punot Union are verifiable, see: http://punotup.joypurhat.gov.bd/node/971865 on Government portal of Bangladesh. But the eidgah apparently do not exist. The photo shown on the article is not even in Bangladesh, let alone be in Punot. This article, as of now, is absolutely a hoax. --»  nafSadh did say 18:46, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Both pages were hoaxes, whether or not places by these names exist. The user has since been blocked. Hairhorn (talk) 22:11, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Looks like he created another account after being blocked. I have reported him to WP:RVAN. SmileBlueJay97 talk  07:12, 20 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Seems like he created yet another account after his second has been blocked. SmileBlueJay97 talk  10:55, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Actually AlJamiEidgah is the first of the (apparent) sock group, then Mdtorikulislam, then Mywikitorikul and I Love The Holy Quran. AJE has been a little tamer than the others—possibly even a different person. —teb728 t c 11:27, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bangladesh-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 15:16, 19 August 2014 (UTC)


 * Comment Any chance of getting a WP:SNOW delete on this one? WikiDan61 ChatMe!ReadMe!! 12:04, 21 August 2014 (UTC)
 * Possibly. This article should have been deleted by now. SmileBlueJay97 talk 09:08, 22 August 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.