Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Lyttle


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. The article's subject is found to lack notability. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  beans  // 00:45, 9 February 2016 (UTC)

Al Lyttle

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non notable boxer Suarez Mason (talk) 20:28, 1 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 00:11, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 00:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 00:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.   Musa Talk  ☻ 00:12, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Martial arts-related deletion discussions. Peter Rehse (talk) 10:49, 2 February 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete does not meet notability requirement for boxers.John Pack Lambert (talk) 04:22, 2 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Fails WP:NBOX and the only reference is a link to his fight record and that's not enough to meet WP:GNG. Papaursa (talk) 05:10, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete As above.Peter Rehse (talk) 09:23, 5 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete Article is highly suspect. After apparently having a nearly 50 fight pro career, he then qualified for the usually amateur competition Commonwealth Games?  Plus, it says he qualified for the 1951 Commonwealth Games, but no such games took place (1950 British Empire Games and 1954 British Empire and Commonwealth Games). RonSigPi (talk) 03:54, 6 February 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as no convincing signs of the applicable notability. SwisterTwister   talk  19:27, 7 February 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.