Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Naama (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jenks24 (talk) 13:44, 22 October 2015 (UTC)

Al Naama
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I simply haven't found anything to suggest better sourcing and improvement and I'm not sure if this is why the first nominator nominated it. The only thing saving this would be archived and offline sources but I simply found nothing to even suggest this exists. This has hardly changed since October 2007 (started by SPA) aside from one blanking and few other contributions. Pinging and. SwisterTwister  talk  01:48, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Iraq-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  01:50, 30 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete -- We sometimes have lists of people by surname, effectively disambiguation pages. This is potentially such a list.  However, since both those listed have no article, they are presumably NN.  Accordingly, there is nothing worth keeping as a navigation tool.  Peterkingiron (talk) 16:09, 6 October 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   16:03, 7 October 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   15:05, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.