Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Parsai


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. 78.26 (spin me / revolutions) 17:48, 28 May 2019 (UTC)

Al Parsai

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per another user. It was unreasonable to CSD this, as all info seems to be properly referenced. Taking to AfD. Lafayette  Baguette  talk   15:09, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Keep: I only nominated due to the CSD. Nominator didn't provide rationale, seems properly referenced and somewhat notable. Lafayette  Baguette   talk   15:10, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:08, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 16:08, 21 May 2019 (UTC)


 * Delete. The references here are all primary sources that do not constitute support for notability. People do not get Wikipedia articles just because they have staff profiles on the self-published websites of their own employers — notability is measured in terms of reliable source coverage about the topic in media, not just the ability to use his own self-created web presence as technical verification that he exists. If you want to make him notable enough for an encyclopedia article, what needs to be shown is that journalists have written content about him in newspapers or magazines, not just that his own employers have staff directories. The rule on here is not that as long as the article says things that sound potentially notable, the references can be just any random web page you can find — the notability test is the extent to which he has or has not been the subject of journalism. Bearcat (talk) 18:02, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 *  Delete . I had already put a CSD tag on it but removed it and decided to bring it to AFD stating its notable and properly sourced. I will still stand on deleting as it fails WP:BASIC. Lapablo (talk) 18:23, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 *  Delete  Not a single independent reliable source. Best, GPL93 (talk) 19:15, 21 May 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete all that my searches turn up are some opinion columns in local papers like the Chatham Daily News; Chatham, Ontario. Fails WP:GNG.E.M.Gregory (talk) 01:50, 27 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.