Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al Weed


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was delete. Can&#39;t sleep, clown will eat me 20:58, 18 July 2006 (UTC)

Al Weed
Yet another nn candidate for public office. Wildthing61476 21:15, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete. per nom. Nathan Beach 21:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. per nom. He's a former Major who's gotten nominated so he matters least till the election is over. grazon 21:37, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: "Keep per nom" makes absolutely no sense. "Per nom" means "for the same reason as the nominator", and the nominator is asking for the page to be deleted, not kept. Stifle (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Artw 22:58, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete Candidacy in and of itself does not make one notable. Wikipedia is not here to give candidates free press. --DarkAudit 23:28, 13 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment AfD was removed from page by author, I have replaced. Wildthing61476 02:02, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment AfD was removed because it had changed since you labled it. and again his being a candidate isn't enough no but he's gotten nominated now grazon 17:24, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete, he'll matter AFTER the election, if he wins. Now he's just another candidate. -- nae'blis (talk) 18:45, 14 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Keep. A poor guy who went to Yale served in Vietnam rose to the rank of major and has been nominated to run or congress? this guy is impressive. 75.7.152.96 21:07, 15 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment: Unregistered users' recommendations are not generally considered on AFD. Stifle (talk) 19:05, 16 July 2006 (UTC)
 * Delete or Merge with Virginia U.S. House election, 2006. Proposed guidelines at Candidates and elections suggest articles on the election itself be created first. I think candidacy for federal offices should be notable (articles on incumbents can and do include info on their candidacies), however current policy doesn't permit that. The rules say delete, or preferably merge with a page on the election itself. Scorpiondollprincess 14:11, 18 July 2006 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.