Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Al wathba national insurance awnic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. WP:TNT. Opabinia regalis (talk) 05:16, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

Al wathba national insurance awnic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A case of WP:TNT. Company may be notable, but if you remove all of the promotional content, there would be nothing left. Written by an editor with a possible COI, advertisement masquerading as articles, doesn't seem to adequately sum up its sources anyway. &mdash; kikichugirl  oh hello! 21:39, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Support TNT for all the reasons above. The company might be notable, but it's hard to tell without removing the puffery/promotional stuff. Joseph2302 (talk) 21:49, 1 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - None of the references show any notability.--Rpclod (talk) 05:09, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: The original author left a very appropriate inquiry at my talk page.  I  responded at the author's talk page.  The author is obviously trying to address shortcomings at the page.  If possible, please slow this process to give the author an opportunity to find and reference additional indicia of notability.  Any further guidance for the author might also be appreciated.--Rpclod (talk) 13:01, 3 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - Another case of the article being promotional and in need of starting anew. A News search found a few results sprinkled here and there (nothing significant and a lexology.com link about a lawsuit against this company), a few links at thefreelibrary and highbeam and Books found mostly listings. SwisterTwister   talk  05:34, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete. No significant coverage in Reliable sources about the company. BeenAroundAWhile (talk) 22:45, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment The user looks to have been blocked for persistent advertising/promotion. Joseph2302 (talk) 14:23, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Arab Emirates-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 21:47, 3 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:ADMASQ - Article is clearly promotional and the author is now blocked for promotion. --Nick—Contact/Contribs 22:58, 7 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.