Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alaa Najjar (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Andy Mabbett ( Pigsonthewing ); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:29, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

AfDs for this article:

Alaa Najjar

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There are only a few news sources about him, The page must be checked again. Emir Alemdar 80 (talk) 07:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Emir Alemdar 80 (talk) 07:04, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 08:29, 19 October 2021 (UTC)

Also who made this deletion request is a sock puppet for the user: علي أبو عمر He usually uses Arabic and Turkish names. And a message to: Emir Alemdar 80. Alaa article will remain and you will soon be banned. --Osps7 (talk) 17:32, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep and close - no substantive rationale provided, what rationale there is describes the subject meeting WP:GNG, checking is the job of the nominator, and this was nominated for deletion (and kept) less than 2 months ago. The place for challenging a deletion result is WP:DRV.  St ★ lwart 1 1 1 10:36, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep per WP:SKCRIT #1. Nomination isn't a valid WP:DEL-REASON and this article was kept at deletion discussion very recently. Also note that the nominator registered their account only 5 days ago. Qwaiiplayer (talk) 13:00, 19 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep The article achieves notability, and there is also a previous discussion and the discussion was ended by preserving the article and not deleting it.
 * Speedy keep and close - I would be bold and remove the AfD template, but will leave that to a "closing admin", as I believe that's the procedure. This frivolous nomination is by a single-purpose sockpuppet, and should not have to wait seven days for closure. --Fjmustak (talk) 18:24, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.