Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alabama Republic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Stifle (talk) 15:01, 17 December 2014 (UTC)

Alabama Republic

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per the article, this is at most an "informal" name. No useful information to merge. Ed [talk] [majestic titan] 09:46, 7 December 2014 (UTC)

This was messed up as it flowed on to a deletion discussion about the Republic of Georgia (1861). That deletion discussion did not have a header, so some of the discussion there may apply to this discussion. I have added the header that now keeps that discussion separate, but those who understand the topic may want to add something here from the Georgia discussion.-- Bduke   (Discussion)  10:08, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Alabama-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica1000 20:39, 7 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete This is the same nonsense like what we had at Articles for deletion/Republic of Louisiana. Neither this article nor the others on the chopping block should have been created. Chris Troutman  ( talk ) 00:17, 8 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Merge or plain redirect per other nom flagged on page. Little worthwhile content.  Peterkingiron (talk) 19:05, 9 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete possibly merge flag info, but the name "Republic" itself is still dubious and not adequately supported. Red Harvest (talk) 06:53, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as written — attempting to elevate a colloquial name for a short-lived independent state to "Republic" status — with no prejudice against later creation of an article Secession of Alabama, which would be encyclopedic. Carrite (talk) 15:06, 10 December 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.