Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aladdin's Dragons


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. (non-admin closure) sst✈ 12:25, 7 October 2015 (UTC)

Aladdin's Dragons

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I simply found nothing to suggest better improvement with the best results here and there's no good move target. Notifying author and recent editor  and I would've also notified  but they're obviously not very active. SwisterTwister  talk  22:16, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  SwisterTwister   talk  22:18, 15 September 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Delete. It looks like fun, but I can't really find any true coverage for this game. It exists, but that doesn't give notability in and of itself. If the game maker or his company (R&D Games) had an article on Wikipedia I'd suggest a redirect, but neither one does and I'm not entirely certain that they'd merit one, although I haven't done an exhaustive search. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)  04:39, 16 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep The game was the Game of the Year in 2001 Games 100, nominee of 2001 International Gamers Awards (General Strategy - Multi Player),, nominee of 2003 Nederlandse Spellenprijs,, and got 9th place in 2000 Deutscher Spiele Preis. The game looks notable enough to have a Wikipedia article. Bharatiya29 (talk) 07:53, 22 September 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 16:36, 22 September 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk   08:33, 29 September 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep per Bharatiya29. BOZ (talk) 10:45, 29 September 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.