Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Aladdin's Eatery


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Withdrawn. (non-admin closure) KuroiShiroi (contribs) 20:01, 18 May 2009 (UTC)

Aladdin's Eatery
AfDs for this article: 
 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

No indication of notability. KuroiShiroi (contribs) 03:29, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep per this Google News Archive search. Notability is confirmed by this source from the Washington Post, this source from Beacon Journal, this source from the Pittsburgh Post-Gazette, etc. This restaurant chain easily passes WP:CORP. Cunard (talk) 06:48, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Projectify. I'm on the fence. Although the articles Cunard found clearly establish notability, I think the current article is of sufficiently crappy quality to delete anyway. So to avoid having a bad quality article lying around, I suggest we move this to the project space of WikiProject Food and drink until such time it's ready for mainspace again. See it as userfication for improvements. - Mgm|(talk) 11:00, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep and improve, notability is established by reliable sources. -- J mundo 16:03, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. "Bad quality" is a reason to improve an article, not to send it to purgatory. The article is more likely to get the attention it needs here than in project space. Either way, there doesn't seem to be any dispute that the article meets Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, even if it doesn't meet some other editors' personal criteria for inclusion. — Bdb484 (talk) 16:52, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep article has been greatly improved and notability has been established by added sources. --kelapstick (talk) 17:23, 18 May 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.