Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alain Tytgadt


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. J04n(talk page) 18:24, 23 November 2014 (UTC)

Alain Tytgadt

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

False information about a non-public figure. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Orangeblue blueorange (talk • contribs) 18:47, October 4, 2014 (UTC)

Not notable, only one citation that doesn't even have the information that's in the article.Pgold009 (talk) 16:55, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Relisting comment: This discussion was created without a template and never transcluded to a daily log. Addition to Articles for deletion/Log/2014 November 6 is its first proper listing.  The creation of this AfD is the above editor's only activity under that account.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -- Finngall  talk  16:22, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Businesspeople-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  19:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Belgium-related deletion discussions.  Jinkinson   talk to me  19:06, 6 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - this is not a good article by any stretch, but the subject is notable. Bloomberg confirms the information in this article. A quick google search turns up a number of potential references (mainly in the Belgian press), for example:, , --Lemnaminor (talk) 14:39, 7 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Natg 19 (talk) 07:49, 14 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete For the sake of this discussion I will assume the article is correct. Nothing about the positions this person has held or the level of coverage they have received from the media causes them to rise to the level of being notable. Being the head of a non-notable company does not make one notable. Even the heads of most notable businesses are not notable.John Pack Lambert (talk) 19:01, 15 November 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete: as non-notable (WP:NBUSINESS). Quis separabit?  15:37, 21 November 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.