Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alameda-Weehawken Tunnel


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was deleted as confirmed hoax. - Mgm|(talk) 10:13, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

Alameda-Weehawken Tunnel

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This is an obvious hoax; and  prove it beyond any doubt. NE2 06:36, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Ugh, and someone actually bothered setting up a whole blog entry for this nonsense? Let's just say that if there really were a transcontinental tunnel across America, it would be in just about every world record book. Sjakkalle (Check!)  09:15, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * It sounds hoaxy but you haven't got me convinced with those photos yet. How can you possibly determine which of those photos show the real name? - Mgm|(talk) 09:17, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * I saw the "Alameda Tunnel" photo and immediately thought "where have I seen this portal before?" There should be enough at to convince you. --NE2 09:19, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * That works for me. Delete. - Mgm|(talk) 13:32, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete (A7) (G3) — complete and utter WP:BOLLOCKS. This made my day! You're telling me that someone went as far as altering an image older to try to prove something exists that is physically impossible to begin with? We need to remember that this is Wikipedia, not The Onion (see the Mexi-Canadian Overpass). MuZemike  ( talk ) 17:52, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Note — G3 can work, as well. MuZemike  ( talk ) 17:56, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * G3 can work, but not A7 which does not apply to objects--just people, groups, and web content. DGG (talk) 19:44, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * You are right. Changing to G3. MuZemike  ( talk ) 21:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete as hoax. Neil916 (Talk) 20:46, 27 October 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - not the best hoax I have seen, but pretty darn good :) Exit2DOS2000   •T•C•  02:41, 28 October 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.