Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alamela


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Australia's Next Top Model, Cycle 4.  MBisanz  talk 22:03, 28 February 2009 (UTC)

Alamela

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Fails Notability (people) as she is only known for appearing on Australia's Next Top Model and a few minor commercial adverts. Plastikspork (talk) 15:32, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions.  -- &mdash; LinguistAtLarge • Talk  15:33, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Speedy delete A7 (Non-notable person). ApprenticeFan (talk) 23:30, 23 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep This inadequate argument for deletion could also be used against the numerous other pages of Australia's Next Top Model contestants, ie Jordan Loukas, Samantha Downie, Demelza Reveley. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Naturaltrust (talk • contribs) 07:00, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: See Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions and Arguments to avoid in deletion discussions. And, thank you for bringing these other four to my attention. I will look through them and nominate the ones that aren't sufficiently notable. Plastikspork (talk) 22:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep Unfortunately chiefly notable at this stage due to what happened on Australia's Next Top Model, but appears to be someone going further after the participation in the television program. SEO75  [  talk  ]  11:52, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Compromise? Her page could be redirected to Australia's Next Top Model, Cycle 4, which would preserve the page history and allow it to be revived if she accomplished more to make her sufficiently notable to warrant the creation of her own page. Plastikspork (talk) 22:26, 24 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment I normally regard the goings-on of so-called reality shows as sub-trivial. However, this girl seems to be behaving with a modicum of decency and to be getting on with real real life - unlike the winner of the show. While not yet having achieved anything that I would regard as particularly notable (I don't regard models as particularly notable with the possible exceptions of Twiggy who is intelligent, and Naomi Campbell about whom I won't comment), she has become the subject of notability. (Some are born notable, some achieve notability, some have notability thrust upon them...) I would go with the idea of a redirect, but with the basic info of the controversy and a brief note of her subsequent career as well added to the main article. I would not be displeased with a Keep result if the others involved in the trouble still have articles. I know that 'she's got one, so should I' is not Wikipedia policy, but... Peridon (talk) 22:50, 24 February 2009 (UTC)


 * Redirect to Australia's Next Top Model, Cycle 4 per Plastikspork -Misty Willows (talk) 07:00, 25 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect with Australia's Next Top Model, Cycle 4 per Plastikspork. THF (talk) 23:33, 27 February 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect to preserve some information about him in relation to a larger context. Themfromspace (talk) 04:13, 28 February 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.