Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Aisenberg


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. –  Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 03:21, 28 August 2015 (UTC)

Alan Aisenberg

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Meets WP:BLP1E. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 02:37, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:07, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. -- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:25, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment: Can you explain why BLP1E applies here? this source says that he appeared in multiple films prior to the current appearance on TV. A person who has made multiple public appearances on film and TV seems an unlikely candidate for BLP1E protection. 109.79.90.87 (talk) 12:57, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Because he is not notable for his previous appearances. He is only notable for his current appearance. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 14:08, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Wait, the article has been expanded. sovereign°sentinel (contribs) 14:10, 6 August 2015 (UTC)
 * If by expanded you mean two tables with unreferenced information were added, then yes. No evidence the subject is notable. I've personally been unable to find a single reference about his previous roles, and about his minor role in OISTNB there very few sources available. FoCuS contribs ;  talk to me!  16:30, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * The subject's appearances seem notable and does not seem like an candidate for BLP1E protection.:::: — Preceding unsigned comment added by 173.68.155.249 (talk) 18:26, 7 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:04, 12 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – czar   08:05, 13 August 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 03:56, 20 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete for now or redirect to Orange_Is_the_New_Black as my searches found nothing good aside from low and trivial coverage. SwisterTwister   talk  07:18, 21 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete or redirect. WP:BLP1E doesn't apply here, as that's not applicable to an actor getting notability from a role — but what does apply here is that the article isn't reliably sourced enough to satisfy WP:GNG. Our notability rules for actors do not confer an automatic freebie on every actor who has ever had television or film or stage credits at all — they still require coverage in reliable sources, and one news article about him is not sufficient to satisfy that. (IMDb is never a valid source in and of itself, either — our rules permit it to be listed as an external link on an actor's article, but not to be cited as a reference or to confer their notability in and of itself.) No prejudice against recreation if and when more sourcing can be found — he doesn't need more than OINTB to pass our notability rules for actors, but he does need a more substantive volume of sourcing for it than this. Bearcat (talk) 17:50, 25 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.