Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Beckwith 2

Alan Beckwith was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

This was previously deleted out of process. I am relisting it so it can be reconsidered by all the VfDers. I vote keep. Guanaco 01:43, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete or move to the hypothetical "Wikipeople". No evidence of notability, and most of the content seems unverifiable. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 01:59, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - no real notability, and text is merely a wikified version of 4th result on google.
 * The 4th result on google is an unwikified version of this article. -- Cyrius|&#9998; 02:56, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep. Most of the info seems to come from TV Tome and IMDb, both of which have articles on him. Not exactly a prolific career, but multiple roles in multiple areas of the entertainment industry. Niteowlneils 03:15, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Nothing of note User:MartinSpamer
 * Comment: Prior discussion can be found at Votes for deletion/Alan Beckwith.  The conclusion by the sysop at the end of that discussion was delete.  There were accusations of sockpuppetry which resulted in a vote for undeletion which can be found at Votes for undeletion.  Personally, I don't see what qualifies this as a deletion out of process. Rossami 03:36, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * No change to my prior vote to delete as insufficiently notable. Rossami

Consensus on Votes for undeletion was to keep deleted, but Guanaco only seems interested in following proper process when he wants to, despite consensus. I have redeleted it as having followed the consensus to keep deleted.
 * It was deleted out of process (twice), so I have undeleted it per the undeletion policy. The vote was 6-4 to delete, and none of the votes to keep were by sockpuppet accounts. Guanaco 16:51, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)


 * Delete again: not sufficiently notable. Wile E. Heresiarch 18:11, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete - He was on Miami Vice and Chips, and he explored caves? Not notable enough.. ClockworkTroll 20:26, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete as nonnotable, at least on basis of current article. Borderline, would reconsider if article were improved to provide evidence of more achievement than it does presently. Don't know what fresh can of worms this is. I affirm that I am not a sockpuppet. [[User:Dpbsmith|Dpbsmith (talk)]] 20:50, 3 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * But I am! Socrates_M_Puppet 13:00, 1 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Support speedy, validly deleted, undeletion was out of order IMO. Andrewa 10:31, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Just delete this thing. Not noteworthy. --Improv 21:28, 4 Oct 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.