Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Briskin


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. No input appears forthcoming Star   Mississippi  13:30, 29 April 2022 (UTC)

Alan Briskin

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Cannot find any independent in-depth coverage in reliable sources, either those in the article or elsewhere online - lack of WP:SIGCOV. Fails WP:GNG and WP:NACADEMIC. Run-of-the-mill person. Promotional article, created by a WP:SPA. Edwardx (talk) 11:40, 7 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  11:50, 14 April 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:46, 21 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:00, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep: More than 400 citations for The Stirring of Soul in the Workplace indicates that he passes WP:PROF as making a significant impact in the field of organizational psychology. StAnselm (talk) 16:05, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Alan's Briskins books, especially "Collective Wisdom," have made a worthy contribution to our current understanding of collective wisdom and the place of "soul" in the contemporary psychology of human experience. If one of the criteria for inclusion is the importance and influence of an authors' body of work, Alan Briskin certainly meets that criterion. 73.189.22.95 (talk) 21:02, 22 April 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.