Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Rissberger


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Liz Read! Talk! 00:18, 26 November 2022 (UTC)

Alan Rissberger

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Fails WP:NPEOPLE. The first and second sources, which are the school's staff directory and Alan Rissberger's blog, are clearly not independent nor significant. Third source gives him a passing mention. Fourth source is a paper he wrote which doesn't establish notability. Quick Google search finds no other WP:V or WP:SIGCOV-satisfying sources. Quaemenelimbus ( 🗨 here ) ^_^ 00:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Academics and educators.  Quaemenelimbus  ( 🗨 here ) ^_^ 00:18, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: New York and North Carolina.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 00:36, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Fails WP:GNG. None of the sources in the article meet GNG, nor do any of the other sources which I found whilst searching. ProofRobust 01:16, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Unless they somehow acquire state or national-level media attention or win awards at those levels and pass WP:GNG, high school teachers are almost always non-notable. I see no evidence that this one is an exception. —David Eppstein (talk) 01:31, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete. Clearly not notable, no state or national level recognition.  &maltese; SunDawn &maltese;     (contact)   03:15, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete per comments above. No notability nor reliable sources can be seen. Timothytyy (talk) 03:19, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - Lacks WP:N and any WP:INDEPENDENT sources Pranesh Ravikumar (talk) 06:24, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete - probably should have been A7'd. Fails GNG. Onel 5969  TT me 15:06, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete I agree this should have been speedied under WP:A7. I think the AfD should probably also close earlier per WP:SNOW. Best, GPL93 (talk) 12:24, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Delete no special claim of importance. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 21:59, 23 November 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.