Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Thornett


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:18, 4 June 2011 (UTC)

Alan Thornett

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable. As a functionary in a small British political party, Thornett does not meet criteria for WP:POLITICIAN or any of the general criteria. TreveXtalk 17:21, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Passes WP:GNG. He has received substantial coverage such as this 1976 article in The Age. Press coverage of the subject on Google news spans over 30 years and is international in scope. Pburka (talk) 19:27, 21 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:45, 22 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 02:46, 22 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:31, 28 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep Long-term influence in the convolutions of various Trotskyist organisations; see the 6 references in Alexander's "International Trotskyism, 1929-1985" for example. AllyD (talk) 09:14, 28 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep per above; main figure in a small group, but has received coverage in reliable sources out of proportion to its size. Warofdreams talk 13:39, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions.  — -- Cirt (talk) 17:57, 3 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.