Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alan Winterton


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. &mdash; Coffee //  have a cup  //  ark  // 12:07, 5 March 2010 (UTC)

Alan Winterton

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Winterton is not a professional athlete, so he is not notable because of his cycling. His being president of the ZCF is also not notable, since he has not been in the news because of that. The article shows no notability, and I could find no external sources that show notability. I PRODded this article, but apparently it has been PRODded before (and revived?) so it has to see the AfD-procedure.  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Tim Song (talk) 03:54, 18 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Zimbabwe-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Athletes-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:41, 11 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, C T J F 8 3  GoUSA 01:27, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete - Not significantly notable. -RobertMel (talk) 05:36, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep' Head of a notable organization, but the article requires external references. Doc Quintana (talk) 16:13, 25 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. No reliable sources are cited in the article and I can't find any via google.  The news archive search came up completely empty (he has a namesake in Utah) and the websearch produced nothing but directy listings, user created content, and wikipedia mirrors.  Until and unless independent, reliable sources covering the subject in sufficient detail to support an article can be found, it should be deleted.  Eluchil404 (talk) 02:51, 5 March 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.