Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alandré van Rooyen


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Weak Keep and Weak Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 22:15, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

Alandré van Rooyen

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

I am unable to find enough coverage of the subject, a South African rugby union player, to meet WP:GNG or WP:SPORTCRIT. All I found was routine transfer news (1, 2). JTtheOG (talk) 23:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Sportspeople, Rugby union,  and South Africa. JTtheOG (talk) 23:31, 14 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Weak delete Absolutely heaps of coverage, but the majority of it is transactional, a bit of a surprise given he played in the English top league, but heyho. Rugbyfan22 (talk) 18:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)

, , , . Otbest (talk) 19:00, 16 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 21 May 2024 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 22:03, 28 May 2024 (UTC)
 * Week Keep - Found this should pass WP:BASIC
 * 1 is a primary source. 2 is a duplicate of 4, which is a routine transactional announcement with two sentences of coverage. 3 is a routine transactional announcement with two sentences of coverage. Even BASIC requires significant coverage in multiple published secondary sources. JTtheOG (talk) 19:20, 16 May 2024 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.