Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alarice Keesick


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  MBisanz  talk 00:44, 15 August 2016 (UTC)

Alarice Keesick

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Delete. Poorly sourced and advertorially-toned WP:BLP of a youth activist with no strong claim of encyclopedic notability per any of Wikipedia's inclusion rules. The only references here are the primary source web page of an organization she's directly involved with and a single article on a non-notable news blog, and even that "news" article verifies only that the subject made her high school honour roll. But making your high school honour roll isn't something that gets a person into an encyclopedia in and of itself, and nothing else written or sourced here makes a credible claim of notability either. Also probable conflict of interest of some sort, as the article was created by User:Theaboriginalinspiredteen (which clearly implies the creator is either the subject herself, or someone she knows who's trying to promote her.) As always, Wikipedia is not a free public relations platform on which people are entitled to have articles just because they exist. Bearcat (talk) 17:54, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politicians-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Manitoba-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 18:00, 7 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete non-notable activist.John Pack Lambert (talk) 00:29, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions. Graham (talk) 03:10, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete – Clearly not notable. And the creator is almost certainly the subject given that one of the headings is in the first person. Graham (talk) 03:18, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete as non notable and as said above there's a strong possibility its an autobio. Paste  Let’s have a chat. 07:41, 8 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.