Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alatau (sanatorium)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep as rough consensus to keep. (non-admin closure) Kj cheetham (talk) 11:34, 30 June 2022 (UTC)

Alatau (sanatorium)

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Former sanatorium currently a Swissotel. No indication of notability, fails WP:NBUILD, "may be notable as a result of their historic, social, economic, or architectural importance, but they require significant in-depth coverage by reliable, third-party sources to establish notability." Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  12:02, 14 June 2022 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  14:16, 21 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture and Kazakhstan. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:38, 7 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep - This does look like its considered a significant cultural property, especially with the government status. The coverage looks significant - one independent source calls it "famous" - even from Forbes. Oakshade (talk) 03:12, 10 June 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep per User:Oakshade. Here is Google-translated version of their first link, where "famous" asserted repeatedly. Built in 1982(?) that is 40 years old, but the place does seem notable, historic even. User:Alexandermcnabb, your nomination doesn't say you performed wp:BEFORE, did you search for sources?--Doncram (talk) 06:38, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Comment Yes, I did, and no I wouldn't note on every nom that I did WP:BEFORE - and the Forbes piece is not RS, being community generated. It's a 40 year old Soviet sanatorium that is now a Swissotel. I quoted NP:BUILD above, and this building fails that standard. Best Alexandermcnabb (talk) 06:47, 23 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Keep. The government designation seems equivalent to the National Register of Historic Places designation in the United States. As such, I think it passes WP:NBUILDING.4meter4 (talk) 15:43, 29 June 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.