Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alba AR5


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete‎ __EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. ✗ plicit  12:20, 26 April 2023 (UTC)

Alba AR5

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Not notable enough. Sources present in the article are nowhere near strong enough to suggest notability; racingsportscars should only be used as a last-resort source for race results only (i.e. it should not be used to confer notability.) A comprehensive BEFORE brings up nothing significant. This seems to be a continuation of Davism's habit of creating sports cars that don't have any notability, such as March-BMW M1/C. X750. Spin a yarn? Articles I've screwed over? 08:43, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Products, Motorsport,  and Italy.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 09:23, 19 April 2023 (UTC)
 * Delete. No coverage found in Wikipedia Library (general search) or ProQuest. Supercars.net also has an entry for the Alba AR5 (including a photo and a few sentences), but like RacingSportsCars, the site should only be cited with great care as a source on Wikipedia, and does not count as a reliable source establishing notability per Wikipedia guidelines including WP:GNG. Cielquiparle (talk) 09:05, 24 April 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.