Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Alban Towers

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was keep. sjorford &rarr;&bull;&larr; 17:17, 3 May 2005 (UTC)

Alban Towers
Is there enough here? I live in a historic building too, and it has some history, but I don't think it gets an article. CoolGuy 08:28, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep - everyone is right. I just wanted a second opinion.  To all: where is a better place to get an opinion on something without putting up a VFD notice.  Let me know on my talk page?  CoolGuy 22:01, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, presumably the National Register of Historic Places know which buildings are worth covering. Kappa 09:44, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, the building appears to significant for its history more so than its architecture but its history seems notable enough. Andypasto 10:13, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nothing gained through loss.  --Teknic 10:41, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Yeah, I can see keeping all of the National Registery buildings, though this needs expansion. RickK 19:32, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Its history and distinct architecture, if enough for the National Register of Historic Places shoudl also be enough for Wikipedia.Washingtonian 16:02, April 26, 2005 (UTC)
 * User has four edits.
 * Keep. Seems notable enough to me and the original author seems to be busy cleaning it up.  SteveW | Talk 21:34, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable building in notable city and the article is a good one. Capitalistroadster 00:59, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. What Kappa said.--Gene_poole 02:32, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, notability established. Radiant_* 08:51, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep Any building, or site, on the NRHP (or its equivalent in other countries) is notable. Dsmdgold 14:52, Apr 27, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep. Notable architecture. Quale 21:30, 29 Apr 2005 (UTC)


 * This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.