Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albania–Estonia relations (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. A redirect is possible, but there's no consensus here where to redirect to.  Sandstein  06:46, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

Albania–Estonia relations
AfDs for this article: 
 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

whilst the outcome of last AfD was redirect, someone has tried to undo this and recreate the article. so I'm putting it here for community consensus. no resident embassies and the level of trade is miniscule at less than 2 million euros. many companies trade this in a day. the 2 agreements including double taxation are extremely standard in bilateral relations. those wanting to keep must show evidence of third party coverage. — Preceding unsigned comment added by LibStar (talk • contribs) 01:28, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions.  WC  Quidditch   &#9742;   &#9998;  01:30, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 06:08, 26 May 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete (or, if consensus is leaning that way, Redirect to "Foreign relations of Estonia" as was the previous destination). Such relations as there are would seem to be entirely run-of-the-mill things for two countries on the same continent. In a sense, there's the moderately remarkable fact that two countries from behind the old Iron Curtain don't do more together, but that hardly makes an article and also isn't desperately remarkable. BigHaz - Schreit mich an 06:45, 26 May 2017 (UTC)
 * Keep there is more content here than in 2009 when it was first nominated, just compare in the edit history. The duplicate Albania-Estonia relations on the other hand needs to be merged with the correctly dashed version. Tim! (talk) 16:10, 29 May 2017 (UTC)
 * you haven't presented an argument to how notability is met. LibStar (talk) 23:21, 29 May 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment: this is (as far as I can see) identical to Albania-Estonia relations (note the different dashes). Both pages used to be a redirect to Foreign relations of Estonia until 25 May 2017, when added almost exactly the same text to both pages. I think they should probably just be both turned back into a redirect to Foreign relations of Estonia.  Seagull123  Φ  19:41, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
 * has replied to a comment I left on their talk page about this with this message, It was a mistake :/ i dont know how it happens, i thought the first article were deleted i dont know why but i see now the problem! im sorry.  Seagull123  Φ  21:54, 2 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Sandstein   07:56, 3 June 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Merge with Albania-Estonia relations or redirect to Foreign relations of Estonia Deathlibrarian (talk) 13:06, 3 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Redirect back to Foreign relations of Estonia & protect from recreation to avoid further AfD debates. There's nothing to merge as the article does not list 3rd party sources. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:31, 5 June 2017 (UTC)
 * ??? Why Foreign relations of Estonia and not Foreign relations of Albania? 216.8.145.227 (talk) 14:32, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, SpinningSpark 13:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete then; no need for a redirect. K.e.coffman (talk) 04:47, 18 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - lack of significant coverage to comply with WP:GNG. No need for a redirect - not a plausible search term. PhilKnight (talk) 00:21, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - so essentially zero bilateral relations, right? Bearian (talk) 01:42, 20 June 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.