Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albania–Indonesia relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Consensus and jurisprudence is to delete (✉→ BWilkins ←✎) 11:30, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

Albania–Indonesia relations

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

fails WP:GNG. I found no significant coverage of actual bilateral relations. no evidence of state visits, neither country has an embassy. the fact that Albania backed an unsuccessful bid for Indonesia to get a non permanent seat of the UN security council doesn't add much. the level of trade is very low, less than USD$5M. many companies trade more than that a day. LibStar (talk) 00:13, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete. Another one of these... 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 00:33, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Indonesia-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:03, 31 May 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. Evano1van(எவனோ ஓருவன்) 06:04, 31 May 2013 (UTC)


 * Keep IMHO bilateral relations are always intrinsically notable, and they can be almost always sourced reliably. Even the very fact that the relationship is factually trivial is an interesting information to the reader, while the absence of the article does not imply so: it just leaves the reader in the dark. -- Cycl o pia talk  13:06, 4 June 2013 (UTC)
 * WP also does not contain articles about most of the world's laws. absence of an article does not imply the legislation does not exist, nor does it leave the reader in the dark. WP:ITSINTERESTING is not a reason for keeping. LibStar (talk) 05:14, 10 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 06:09, 7 June 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete No evidence of a notable relationship at present Nick-D (talk) 08:43, 7 June 2013 (UTC)
 * Keep agree with Cyclopia, a bilateral relationship, although not intense or "notable" is still exist and deserve an article, although just a short or stub one is better than nothing. Actually in Indonesian view, Albania stand out as a European nation with Muslim majority, similar case with Bosnia-Herzegovina. (note: Indonesia has the largest Muslim population in the world). Moreover there are tons of other bilateral relations articles that provides less data, less information, and probably less notable than this one exist.Gunkarta (talk) 05:19, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * see WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS, the simple fact that 2 countries have the same religious majority does not mean a notable relationship. how about some sources to establish notability? LibStar (talk) 07:15, 14 June 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.