Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albanian Association in Middle East


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. MuZemike 22:55, 3 November 2009 (UTC)

Albanian Association in Middle East

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Contested WP:PROD, the article has only one external cite and doesn't assert notability or pass WP:V Mifter (talk) 23:10, 13 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:00, 20 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete - insufficient coverage in reliable sources to etablish notability. -- Whpq (talk) 16:18, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albania-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Middle East-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- Ron Ritzman (talk) 23:47, 19 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * weak keep To delete the associations pages does not seem to be a good idea unless there's a conflict, wrong claim or so on. It might connect people who need it. Improvement of the page and keeping it is recommended. Olivemountain (talk) 02:30, 23 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment. You are essentially saying it's userful which isn't a good reason for keeping an article.  Significant coverage about the association is needed. -- Whpq (talk) 10:20, 23 October 2009 (UTC)

Im the author and as external information becomes available in English this article will be updated. So, I strongly recommend that this article is not deleted. —Preceding unsigned comment added by BBuchi (talk • contribs) 22:06, 26 October 2009 (UTC)
 * But if there are no sources now, then there isn't material to support the inclusion of the article in wikipedia. If those sources appear in the future, then would be the time for an article. -- Whpq (talk) 13:56, 27 October 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 13:43, 27 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete since the article's subject does not meet the notability criteria. Cordless Larry (talk) 07:41, 30 October 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete no third party coverage found in gnews. LibStar (talk) 05:55, 2 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.