Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albany Medical Clinic


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. -- Cirt (talk) 01:06, 21 May 2010 (UTC)

Albany Medical Clinic

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Non-notable clinic; no evidence of notability has been provided.  PK T (alk)  16:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)

Article has been proposed for deletion, but prod was removed with the comment, "remove dated prod, notable medical clinic" in the edit summary. No improvement made to the article to indicate what makes the clinic notable.  PK T (alk)  16:37, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator.--IslandAtSea (talk) 17:56, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Comment. Claims to be the first family-practice in Toronto and cited as such in Toronto Star. Staff also appear as sources for journalists in news stories about job action, vaccine and technology in health care but only occassionally. Canuckle (talk) 18:17, 12 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:42, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Ontario-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 16:43, 13 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nominator.--Gordon 41  23:49, 14 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Keep - The Toronto Star article verifies that the clinic is "Ontario's first group medical practice".. Ontario is Canada's largest province, and the first medical clinic in that province is certainly notable. Vanruvan (talk) 12:16, 18 May 2010 (UTC)
 * I'm not sold on your argument, but the point of this is to update the article to demonstrate that the Clinic is notable, if the article is indeed worth keeping.  PK  T (alk)  02:25, 19 May 2010 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:03, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Comment: This was flagged for rescue so I took a look.  I tidied it up a bit, but unless more articles beyond the single Toronto Star piece can be found, this one will have a difficult time finding a consensus to keep.--Milowent (talk) 04:56, 19 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Notability not established through reliable sources. Aditya Ex Machina  09:30, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Does seem to rather lack any notability other then it exsists.Slatersteven (talk) 14:44, 20 May 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.