Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Hagenaars


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. § FreeRangeFrog croak 20:27, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

Albert Hagenaars

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was PRODded with reason: "No independent sources. Works published only by very small publishers. Only confirmed award is only a very minor one ("Sakko Prijs" seems to be limited to one small Dutch town, Bergen op Zoom) No indication of notability (tagged since 2010)." PROD was removed by anonymous IP without any reason stated. PROD reason still stands, hence: delete. Randykitty (talk) 06:58, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of People-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 17:27, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Authors-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 17:27, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions. Randykitty (talk) 17:28, 26 May 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Poetry-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 17:40, 26 May 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, j⚛e deckertalk 15:52, 3 June 2014 (UTC)


 * I agree with the nominator: delete. No coverage of this person, collections not published by notable publishers, vanity article. Drmies (talk) 18:15, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete as per reasons above. I google-searched five SERP pages with more inclusive "web" filter (not more exclusive "news" filter) and did not find anything that indicated notability.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 18:53, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails to meet our notability standards. Epeefleche (talk) 20:23, 10 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.