Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Lévy Themans


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 Talk Work 15:46, 19 April 2021 (UTC)

Albert Lévy Themans

 * – ( View AfD View log )

If he had played in the Olympics, he'd qualify. However, searches turned up very little on this bobsledder, not enough in-depth to show that they pass WP:GNG. Right now the only two sources are brief mentions.  Onel 5969  TT me 15:38, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Netherlands-related deletion discussions.  Spiderone (Talk to Spider) 16:20, 12 April 2021 (UTC)


 * Keep According to GNG "Significant coverage is more than a trivial mention, but it does not need to be the main topic of the source material". As several newspapers wrote sections of an article about him, and one article was about his withdrawal and reasing, thatç clearly more then trivial mentions. Besides of that that, it not fair using Google search as primary identification means for pre-internet people. In many cases, tehre will be offline or foreign language sources. And there would be as he is described as a successful athlete winning several competitions. Also, he is notable enough, that we almost 100 years later writing about him, for example here in 2014 and here in 2019. He was the first Dutch athlete in history that was replaced at the Winter Olympics. SportsOlympic (talk) 16:24, 12 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep. Nine references in the article and there will be more. Sufficient WP:SIGCOV for the WP:GNG. No WP:BLP concern. gidonb (talk) 04:51, 13 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep per the post-nom expansion work.  Lugnuts  Fire Walk with Me 18:58, 14 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Keep the original two-sentence stub inspired no confidence int he subject's notability. However did a spectacular job on bringing the article to its current state. There is no question now that the sourcing supports GNG.--- Possibly (talk) 08:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Judaism-related deletion discussions. gidonb (talk) 20:46, 18 April 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.