Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Schram


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Anarchyte  ( work  &#124;  talk )   07:45, 10 August 2016 (UTC)

Albert Schram

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Subject does not appear to meet WP:GNG, WP:BIO, or, most importantly, WP:ACADEMIC. I conducted a search for him on Google Books and while his research came up often enough, all of the sources I came across were primary ones (i.e., he was the author of the piece, not its subject). This article needs references to reliable independent published sources that discuss the subject himself non-trivially or it needs evidence of having met one of the subject-specific notability guidelines. Right now, it appears to be a résumé. A very good, very impressive résumé, but not a notable one at this point (or so it would appear). KDS4444 (talk) 22:14, 20 July 2016 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Comment. Was speedied multiple times and finally AfDed at the Dutch Wikipedia. The primary concerns were having been machine-translated and being a POVvy résumé. I know that nl-wiki has lower standards when it comes to deletions, but I thought this discussion should be aware of the Dutch AfD. - HyperGaruda (talk) 19:35, 21 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:21, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Oceania-related deletion discussions. North America1000 04:23, 27 July 2016 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep. Passes WP:Prof. Xxanthippe (talk) 04:37, 27 July 2016 (UTC).
 * Keep. Unquestioned keep. Head of a university. The article is written in the typical manner of academic PR, but it is easily fixable, and I've just fixed it. I'll watch it to revert any `improper content that gets added.  DGG ( talk ) 22:29, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:06, 3 August 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep per WP:PROF. —David Eppstein (talk) 03:32, 6 August 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.