Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Schweitzer Foundation for Our Contemporaries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. See WP:NPASR. Kurykh (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2017 (UTC)

Albert Schweitzer Foundation for Our Contemporaries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The subject of this article does not appear to meet the notability criteron at WP:ORG. Of the sources in the article, only this appears usable under that guideline and it doesn't have much to say about the subject itself. Other sources online and in the article appear to be from related charities or routine nonprofit evaluations. VQuakr (talk) 06:32, 15 March 2017 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
 * Keep The organization's campaigns have achieved coverage in independent sources. See, for example, this article in the CBC about it's banning of lobster sales in German supermarkets and this one about it's campaign against foie gras in MeteoWeb.  Searching for the organization's correct name in German (Albert Schweitzer Stiftung für unsere Mitwelt) brings up more sources such as Berlkiner Morgenpost.  The connection to Vipul's paid editing scheme has been declared by the article creator and I see nothing that contradicts the caveats expressed in the close of that ANI thread.  Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 22:18, 22 March 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Kurykh (talk) 00:26, 23 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Animal-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 01:14, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:52, 30 March 2017 (UTC)
 * I did notice the MeteoWeb link during WP:BEFORE; it, the cbc.ca source, and the German one you found are all similar in that they do not discuss the subject itself in sufficient depth to meet WP:GNG. VQuakr (talk) 03:16, 30 March 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.