Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Albert Zambrano


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. j⚛e deckertalk 15:25, 16 June 2014 (UTC)

Albert Zambrano

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable as an Architecture or sculptor. No significant media coverage. Itsalleasy (talk) 02:58, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Philippines-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Architecture-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 04:32, 8 June 2014 (UTC)


 * Delete: When an article lists childhood painting prizes it is unlikely to be on solid notability ground. In this case, refining a Highbeam search to Manila newspapers brought up two passing mentions in respect of assisting students, but that merely confirms his teaching role. No evidence of attained encyclopaedic notability, either via WP:CREATIVE or WP:ACADEMIC. AllyD (talk) 05:45, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete per the analysis by . I was reminded that I was given an art award as a child by a famous stained glass artist. I would never consider that as a claim of notability. I see no evidence that this person is widely considered a leading figure in architecture. Wikipedia is not a directory of every architect, lawyer, doctor, dentist and accountant in the world.  Cullen 328  Let's discuss it  06:08, 8 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete. I don't really see any claim of notability here. —David Eppstein (talk) 20:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * Delete although I found sources in the Philippine Star and the Sun Star but it does not look like it adds up to WP:GNG. Problem is Philippine media is often hard to search.--Tomwsulcer (talk) 23:11, 9 June 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.